Reward and punishment in climate change dilemmas

Autor: Fernando P. Santos, Jorge M. Pacheco, Francisco C. Santos, António Góis
Přispěvatelé: Universidade do Minho
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2019
Předmět:
Zdroj: Scientific Reports, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2019)
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instacron:RCAAP
Scientific Reports
Scientific reports, 9 (1
ISSN: 2045-2322
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-52524-8
Popis: Mitigating climate change effects involves strategic decisions by individuals that may choose to limit their emissions at a cost. Everyone shares the ensuing benefits and thereby individuals can free ride on the effort of others, which may lead to the tragedy of the commons. For this reason, climate action can be conveniently formulated in terms of Public Goods Dilemmas often assuming that a minimum collective effort is required to ensure any benefit, and that decision-making may be contingent on the risk associated with future losses. Here we investigate the impact of reward and punishment in this type of collective endeavors — coined as collective-risk dilemmas — by means of a dynamic, evolutionary approach. We show that rewards (positive incentives) are essential to initiate cooperation, mostly when the perception of risk is low. On the other hand, we find that sanctions (negative incentives) are instrumental to maintain cooperation. Altogether, our results are gratifying, given the a-priori limitations of effectively implementing sanctions in international agreements. Finally, we show that whenever collective action is most challenging to succeed, the best results are obtained when both rewards and sanctions are synergistically combined into a single policy.
SCOPUS: ar.j
info:eu-repo/semantics/published
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje