| Autor: |
Staes, Catherine J1,2 (AUTHOR) catherine.staes@hsc.utah.edu, Beck, Anna C3 (AUTHOR), Chalkidis, George4 (AUTHOR), Scheese, Carolyn H1,2 (AUTHOR), Taft, Teresa2 (AUTHOR), Guo, Jia-Wen1,2 (AUTHOR), Newman, Michael G5 (AUTHOR), Kawamoto, Kensaku2 (AUTHOR), Sloss, Elizabeth A1 (AUTHOR), McPherson, Jordan P6,7 (AUTHOR) |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. Jan2024, Vol. 31 Issue 1, p174-187. 14p. |
| Abstrakt: |
Objectives To design an interface to support communication of machine learning (ML)-based prognosis for patients with advanced solid tumors, incorporating oncologists' needs and feedback throughout design. Materials and Methods Using an interdisciplinary user-centered design approach, we performed 5 rounds of iterative design to refine an interface, involving expert review based on usability heuristics, input from a color-blind adult, and 13 individual semi-structured interviews with oncologists. Individual interviews included patient vignettes and a series of interfaces populated with representative patient data and predicted survival for each treatment decision point when a new line of therapy (LoT) was being considered. Ongoing feedback informed design decisions, and directed qualitative content analysis of interview transcripts was used to evaluate usability and identify enhancement requirements. Results Design processes resulted in an interface with 7 sections, each addressing user-focused questions, supporting oncologists to "tell a story" as they discuss prognosis during a clinical encounter. The iteratively enhanced interface both triggered and reflected design decisions relevant when attempting to communicate ML-based prognosis, and exposed misassumptions. Clinicians requested enhancements that emphasized interpretability over explainability. Qualitative findings confirmed that previously identified issues were resolved and clarified necessary enhancements (eg, use months not days) and concerns about usability and trust (eg, address LoT received elsewhere). Appropriate use should be in the context of a conversation with an oncologist. Conclusion User-centered design, ongoing clinical input, and a visualization to communicate ML-related outcomes are important elements for designing any decision support tool enabled by artificial intelligence, particularly when communicating prognosis risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
