Konceptualizace mores v dramatickém básnictví. Studie o poetice francouzské tragédie v 17. století
| Autor: | Šuman, Záviš |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | čeština |
| Rok vydání: | 2013 |
| Předmět: |
Corneille's Médée
Hérakleios French Classicism Corneille's Discours Andromaque Corneillovy Rozpravy R. Le Bossu T. Tasso Aristotle's Poetics povahokresba v tragédii endogenní přístupy v literární vědě Polyeuktos A. Piccolomini resemblance consistency důslednost Oidipe konceptualizace mores R. Rapin A. Dacier L. Castelevetro podobnost Racine's Alexandre Le Grand d'Aubignac La Mesnardiere řádnost Corneillovy tragédie (Médeia Oidipus Andromaché Cid Britannicus Aristotelian chrestos Aristotelova Poetika Sofonisba) přiměřenost Héraclius L. Castelvetro Sophonisbe Britannicus) Le Cid Saint-Évremond D. Heinsius Polyeucte bienséance Racinovy tragédie (Alexandr Veliký characters in Seventeenth-Century Tragedy J. Chapelain francouzský klasicismus appropriateness verisimilitude |
| Druh dokumentu: | Doctoral Thesis |
| Popis: | 214 Abstract Conceptualization of Mores in Seventeenth-Century French Tragedy This thesis is devoted to the study of interpretations of how tragic characters should be portrayed ("mores", "ethos", "mœurs") in French seventeenth-century theories on Tragedy. The theoretical writings of Jean Chapelain, La Mesnardière, Pierre Corneille, d'Aubignac, René Le Bossu, Rapin, Saint-Évremond, Jean Racine and André Dacier are examined in detail. Their findings are compared with the Latin and Italian commentaries on how the Aristotelian notion "character" ("éthé", "éthos") ought to be perceived and understood and what its impact is on dramatic action. The main focus is paid to the detailed analysis of very divergent and often incompatible interpretations of the four Aristotelian conditions outlined briefly in Chapter XV of Poetics and on how the French theorists and dramatists responded to Aristotle's requirements. The first condition requires dramatic character to be "good of its kind" ("chrestos", "ethos" "chreston", "ethe chresta"). The detailed study of contemporary criticism draws us to a conclusion that there are schematically two approaches on how the French theorists conceptualized this very elusive criterion. Whereas Chapelain in his Préface à l'Adone explicitely rejects the moral meaning of "chrestos" and thus... |
| Databáze: | Networked Digital Library of Theses & Dissertations |
| Externí odkaz: |
|