| Popis: |
A substantial literature has emerged to describe teachersâ systematic labor patterns. A fundamental assumption of this literature has been that teacher turnover occurs between school years. I examine the tenability of this assumption using rich administrative data from North Carolina that enables me to measure teacher turnover not only as an annual event but as occurring at any month throughout the school year. Documenting the teacher turnover that occurs within school year allows for a more complete and accurate picture of how this instability occurs not just between school years, but during the school year as well. Each of the studies of this dissertation, demarcated as chapters, address a different element of within-year teacher turnover. In the first chapter, I describe the frequency with which within-year teacher turnover occurs and the types of teacher and school characteristics associated with higher levels of this type of turnover that has not been addressed in prior research. I also seek to identify the ways in which within-year turnover patterns resemble or differ from end-of -year turnover. In the second chapter, I conduct survival analysis of novice teachersâ monthly turnover patterns to understand differences in the risk of turnover for different teacher entry pathways and school characteristics. In the third paper, I leverage the within-year teacher turnover measure to better understand how three mechanisms linked to teacher turnoverâ(1) teacher instability; (2) classroom disruption; (3) replacement teacher qualityâharm student achievement. I find that an average of four percent of teachers turn over during each school year, suggesting that conventional measures of end-of-year turnover underestimate the actual frequency of turnover by as much as twenty-five percent. In line with the extensive research on end-of-year teacher turnover, within-year turnover is not evenly distributed across schools, with teachers who turnover midyear more likely to exit lower-performing schools with higher concentrations of economically disadvantaged students and underserved racial/ethnic minorities. This finding is troubling given evidence from the third chapter that finds within-year teacher turnover to have a negative effect on student achievement in English Language Arts and mathematics. |
