Research on Supplier Assessment, Quality Improvement and Credibility of Subjective and Objective Scoring Schemes – Taking Taiwan\'s Passive Components as an Example
| Autor: | Tseng,Chao-Ching, 曾昭清 |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Druh dokumentu: | 學位論文 ; thesis |
| Popis: | 107 This research, using evaluation and assessment provided by appropriate suppliers, ensures the data to become more transparent and closer to reality through the assessment and evaluation process management. Even under the circumstances of having more subjective than objective observations, more information still can be distilled from original data. This study will use a passive component company as a case. In regards to the supplier evaluation method, there are nine sub-evaluation indicators. All of aforementioned indicators add up to 100% and will be assessed and explored both subjectively and objectively. In order to effectively establish a monitoring mechanism for a supplier evaluation and find possible anomalies (i.e. over- or under-estimations), we will use K-Means method to target the evaluations of A and B factories from the first quarter of 2017 to the first quarter of 2018 by comparing the original evaluation result with that of the K-Means method categorized into three probable outcomes (i.e. A, B, and C). Grades A, B, and C that belong to qualified suppliers represent a score of 95 points and more, a score of 90 but below 95 points, and a score of 85 but below 90 points, respectively. We hope to find and address the problem through this study, as well as establish a set of objective evaluations to increase quality and ensure consistent supply in the long run. |
| Databáze: | Networked Digital Library of Theses & Dissertations |
| Externí odkaz: |
|