A Study on the Relationships among Career Self-Efficacy, Resilience, and Well-being of College Students
| Autor: | CHEN, JIN-SI, 陳錦錫 |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2017 |
| Druh dokumentu: | 學位論文 ; thesis |
| Popis: | 105 The purpose of the present study was to explore the relationships among Career Self-Efficacy, Resilience, and Well-being of College Students. 887 participants were recruited through the purposive sampling and the random sampling. Three kinds of instrument were measured in this study. The participants were asked to complete the Career Self-efficacy Scale for College Students (CSSCS), the Inventory of Adolescent Resilience (IAR), and the Chinese Happiness Inventory (CHI). The result of the present study were showed as followed: 1. The Career Self-efficacy Scale for College Students had decent validity, reliability and model fit. 2. The participants’ career self-efficacy and resilience are both medium-high level in each scale, while their well-being is medium level in the scale. For the subscales, the mean scores of CSSCS subscales were sorted as follows with statistically significant differences shown: self-understanding, risk-managing, planning, and information-gathering; the mean scores of IAR subscales were sorted as follows statistically significant differences shown: empathy and interpersonal relationship, problem-solving and cognition maturity, and hope and optimism and emotion adjusting, while there was no significant differences shown between hope and optimism and emotion adjusting. 3. The participants not taking the educational courses showed better than those who took the courses on overall career self-efficacy, along with better scores on subscales of CSSCS as “planning,” “information-gathering,” “risk-managing,” and the subscale of IAR as “hope and optimism,” while showed no group differences on well-being. 4. The participants who were double-major showed better than those who didn’t take additional courses on overall career self-efficacy, along with scores on subscales of CSSCS as “planning,” “information-gathering,” and well-being, while showing no group differences on resilience. 5. The participants not being any head of the staff members of students’ council or the student clubs showed better than those who did on the subscales of CSSCS as “information-gathering,” and well-being, while showing no group differences on resilience. 6. There were significantly positve correlation between participants’ age and self-efficacy, age and resilience, and age and well-being. While the explanatory power of self-efficacy ranged from 1.69% to 3.61%, the ones of resilience and well-being, were lower than 1%. 7. There was significantly positive correlation between the participants’ career self-efficacy and resilience. However, the correlation value between self-undestanding subscale and emotion-adjusting subscale was only .10, and the value between information-gathering and emotion-adjusting was only .20. 8. There was significantly positive correlation between the participants’ career self-efficacy and well-being. 9. There was significantly positive correlation between the participants’ career resilience and well-being. 10. The participants’ overall career self-efficacy and overall resilience significantly predicted their well-being. 11. The participants’ “empathy and interpersonal interaction” of IAR predicted the most of explainable variance, while “problem-solving and cognition maturity” of IAR being the second one, and the “self-understanding” of CSSCS as the third one. Discussion of the research results and further suggestion are provided for the parents, educators, counselor, related professionals and future researchers. Keywords: college students, career self-efficacy, resilience, well-being |
| Databáze: | Networked Digital Library of Theses & Dissertations |
| Externí odkaz: |
|