| Popis: |
At the time of this study, there were 165 Expeditionary Learning (EL) schools in the United States, but there was little research on the EL spaces of Crew, Community Meeting (CM), and Electives. The purpose of this study was to address that gap by (a) investigating the spaces of Crew, CM, and Electives in an EL school, (b) discovering the literacy events and practices that existed in these spaces, and (c) reporting on the student experiences in an EL school in regards to literacy, agency, and cultural diversity.This study drew from a theoretical framework that combined socicocultural theory, New Literacy Studies, and theories on agency and adolescents to foreground the socially situated nature of youth and their literacies. The qualitative research design was informed by ethnographic methods in order to grasp how those within the culture understood it and how they made sense of their experience. The data included observations, interviews, focus groups, and document analysis over a year long pilot study and subsequent four month study. In particular, this data reflected the stories of eight case study students across three spaces central to the EL school reform model, Crew, CM, and Electives, in a newly developed EL middle school in a large Midwestern city. Within the three school spaces, I focused my analysis onto two Crews who met every day for three months, fifteen all school Community Meetings, and three Electives that met twice a week for four months. The findings in this study are presented through descriptions of (1) the history and structure of EL as a school reform movement, (2) student experiences within this model, (3) literacy events and practices, and (4) claims about student experiences in Crew, CM, and Electives with regard to student agency, literacies, and cultural diversity. The findings of this study indicated that the EL model comes from and is perpetuated by a privileged, white, middle to upper class male, Christian, heterosexual, and European perspective, which can create certain tensions and possibilities when placed into an urban setting; that adults often determine the students’ experience in this EL school despite the emphasis on the co-construction of community through rhetoric featuring “we are Crew, not passengers” and the Design Principles; and that EL schools provide space for a rich culture of literacy even in the nontraditional spaces of Crew Community Meeting and Electives; however, students are living lives full of rich literacy practices on their own that are not always valued within the model.The study encourages teachers to consider the experiences that the youth in this study share through the data, to consider the rich literacy practices that are made possible through educational spaces like Crew, CM, and Electives, and to engage in explicit discussions and literacy practices involving cultural diversity and student agency. |
