A Comparative Study of Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation in Peri-Trochanteric Fractures in Lateral Decubitus and Supine Position
| Autor: | Viennah Condor, Patrick How |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2024 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Philippine Journal of Orthopaedics, Vol 39, Iss 1 (2024) |
| Druh dokumentu: | article |
| ISSN: | 0118-3362 2012-3264 |
| DOI: | 10.69472/poai.2024.04 |
| Popis: | Objectives. One of the most widely used cephalomedullary devices for unstable peri-trochanteric fractures is the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA). Adequate reduction and fixation are crucial to achieving ideal function and fracture union. Many factors can contribute to the ease of reduction; one of these is the positioning technique. Numerous reports have addressed the advantages and disadvantages of the positioning techniques for antegrade femoral nailing. This study aimed to compare the quality of fixation, adequacy of reduction, bony union, and functional outcomes in PFNAs done in the lateral decubitus and supine position. Methodology. This study was a retrospective cohort study conducted at the Philippine Orthopedic Center. Adult male and female (21 to 65 y/o) patients who underwent open reduction with a PFNA either in the supine or lateral position were included in this study. Thirty-nine (39) patients were identified, where six were lost to follow-up, and four did not have retrievable postoperative radiographs. A total of 29 patients were included. The data were analyzed using the T-test in two population means and Fisher’s Exact Test. Results. At a 95% level of confidence, the study showed no significant differences in the distribution of Tip-Apex Distance (TAD), adequacy of reduction, and bony union at six months post-operatively between the lateral and supine position. In contrast, there was a significant difference in the distribution of the Cleveland index score. Regarding the Harris Hip Score (HHS), there was also a significant difference in the average score between the two groups, but all had an excellent functional outcome. Conclusion. The preferred surgical position for performing an open reduction and fixation with a PFNA remains controversial. This study showed that the surgical position did not affect the TAD, adequacy of the reduction, and bony union. All patients from both groups had excellent functional outcomes at six months post-operatively, but the lateral position group had superior Cleveland index scores. Surgery with the PFNA in the lateral decubitus position can be performed in small rural hospitals that lack a fracture table. With proper surgical technique, this may be safe, executable, and may benefit more patients with peri-trochanteric fractures. |
| Databáze: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|