| Autor: |
Joachim Hansen, Amanda-Louise Fenger Carlander, Kathrine Kronberg Jakobsen, Christian Grønhøj, Christian von Buchwald |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2024 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Systematic Reviews, Vol 13, Iss 1, Pp 1-6 (2024) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
2046-4053 |
| DOI: |
10.1186/s13643-024-02674-2 |
| Popis: |
Abstract Background Salivary hypofunction leads to debilitating oral symptoms and has major complications for overall quality of life. Two of the most frequent causes of xerostomia are radiotherapy in the head and neck and Sjögren’s syndrome. Only symptomatic treatment is available today. An increasing number of both preclinical and clinical studies have suggested that mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) transplantation treatment can increase the salivary flow rate and ameliorate symptoms of xerostomia. However, both adipose-derived and bone marrow–derived MSCs are used, although they differ in important ways. The primary objective of this study is an indirect comparison of the change in the unstimulated salivary flow rate after intervention between patients treated with adipose-derived or bone marrow–derived MSCs. Methods This systematic review and network meta-analysis will search for eligible studies in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL register of Controlled Trials. Eligible studies are as follows: clinical studies including human patients with salivary hypofunction due to either radiotherapy or Sjogren’s syndrome who were subsequently treated with either adipose-derived MSCs or bone marrow–derived MSCs. Studies with no control group will be excluded. The search phrase has been peer-reviewed following the PRESS guidelines. The primary outcome is the change in the unstimulated salivary flow rate after treatment with either adipose-derived or bone marrow–derived MSCs. Secondary outcomes are as follows: change in patient reported outcomes, methods of intervention administration, number of injected MSCs, and safety. Data from included studies will be pooled and compared with a fixed-effects or random effects model dependent on signs of heterogeneity, presented with a forest plot, and indirectly compared with a meta-regression in a network meta-analysis. Risk of bias will be assessed with the tools ROBINS-I or RoB-2 depending on type of study. Discussion Both adipose-derived and bone marrow–derived MSCs are used today for experimental treatment of salivary hypofunction in humans as no direct or indirect comparisons have been made. Therefore, an evaluation of the effect of adipose-derived vs bone marrow–derived MSC treatment is needed to support future decision-making on the type of MSC used in a clinical trial. Systematic review registration PROSPERO ID CRD42024527183. |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
|
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje |
K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit.
|
