| Popis: |
In-stream habitat models at the meso-scale are increasingly used to quantify the effects of hydro-morphological pressures in rivers. The spatial distributions of water depth and velocity represent key attributes of physical habitat. Choosing between field surveys, hydraulic modeling or their integration is made depending on available tools, technical skills, budget and time. However, the sensitivity to such choices of estimated habitat conditions suitable for biological organisms, such as fish, is poorly known.In this study, three commonly used approaches in hydraulic-habitat modeling were compared and tested on a mountain stream, the Mareta River (NE Italy). Two approaches were based on 2D hydraulic modeling, calculated on computational meshes with varying resolution and quality: (1) high-resolution meshes derived from topographical data obtained from Airborne Bathymetric LiDAR; (2) a mesh extrapolated from topographical cross-sectional profiles. The third approach (3) was based on in-stream surveys. From these, suitable channel-area for two fish species, the marble trout (juvenile and adult), and the European bullhead (adult), were estimated.Results showed that decreasing mesh resolution and quality affects the simulated water depth and velocity distributions, both in terms of their average and their standard deviation. The largest differences were found for the in-stream survey-based results. Morphologically complex unit types, such as steps, rapids and pools were more sensitive than simpler mesohabitats, such as glides and riffles. The most sensitive hydro-morphological unit types to the chosen approach were backwaters, glides being the least sensitive, also in terms of their suitability as mesohabitats. Despite that, a key finding is that errors are minimized when deriving habitat - streamflow rating curves at the reach scale, for which all approaches were largely able to reproduce the main characteristics of the curve, i.e. maxima, minima and inflection points. |
