Boundary-based registration improves sensitivity for detecting hypoperfusion in sporadic frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Autor: Sylvia Mihailescu, Quinn Hlava, Philip A. Cook, Maria Luisa Mandelli, Suzee E. Lee, Bradley F. Boeve, Bradford C. Dickerson, Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini, Emily Rogalski, Murray Grossman, James Gee, Corey T. McMillan, Christopher A. Olm
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2024
Předmět:
Zdroj: Frontiers in Neurology, Vol 15 (2024)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 1664-2295
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1452944
Popis: IntroductionFrontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is associated with FTLD due to tau (FTLD-tau) or TDP (FTLD-TDP) inclusions found at autopsy. Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) MRI is often acquired in the same session as a structural T1-weighted image (T1w), enabling detection of regional changes in cerebral blood flow (CBF). We hypothesize that ASL-T1w registration with more degrees of freedom using boundary-based registration (BBR) will better align ASL and T1w images and show increased sensitivity to regional hypoperfusion differences compared to manual registration in patient participants. We hypothesize that hypoperfusion will be associated with a clinical measure of disease severity, the FTLD-modified clinical dementia rating scale sum-of-boxes (FTLD-CDR).Materials and methodsPatients with sporadic likely FTLD-tau (sFTLD-tau; N = 21), with sporadic likely FTLD-TDP (sFTLD-TDP; N = 14), and controls (N = 50) were recruited from the Connectomic Imaging in Familial and Sporadic Frontotemporal Degeneration project (FTDHCP). Pearson’s Correlation Coefficients (CC) were calculated on cortical vertex-wise CBF between each participant for each of 3 registration methods: (1) manual registration, (2) BBR initialized with manual registration (manual+BBR), (3) and BBR initialized using FLIRT (FLIRT+BBR). Mean CBF was calculated in the same regions of interest (ROIs) for each registration method after image alignment. Paired t-tests of CC values for each registration method were performed to compare alignment. Mean CBF in each ROI was compared between groups using t-tests. Differences were considered significant at p
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals