Situational Analysis of Scientific Traditions: Popper´s hermeneutical and political turn in philosophy of science
| Autor: | Ambrosio Velasco Gómez |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | English<br />Persian |
| Rok vydání: | 2023 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Philosophical Investigations, Vol 17, Iss 42, Pp 127-139 (2023) |
| Druh dokumentu: | article |
| ISSN: | 2251-7960 2423-4419 |
| DOI: | 10.22034/jpiut.2000.16577 |
| Popis: | Our analysis of Popper’s philosophy of science focuses on his concepts of tradition and situational analysis. These concepts represent innovative Popperian contributions to a historical and hermeneutical turn in philosophy of science that most of his critics, especially Kuhn, fail to recognize. According to his historical view, Popper conceives sciences as a complex of traditions in continuous transformation and progress by means of rational discussion of theories. In order to grasp the rational progress of scientific traditions, Popper proposes an original method that he calls “situational analysis”. This hermeneutical method seeks to understand the concepts, hypotheses, actions, practices, controversies and products that scientists made to solve problems in their specific historical contexts to improve the truth content of theories. In addition to his historical and hermeneutical turn, Popper also inquired about the social and political conditions for the progress of scientific traditions by means of intersubjective criticism of theories and conjectures. According to him, the rational discussion of ideas requires, as necessary conditions, plurality of ideas, intellectual humility, and freedom of thought and communication that can only exist in an open and democratic society. With these considerations, we may say that in addition to a historical and hermeneutical turn, Popper also contributed to a social and political turn in the philosophy of science |
| Databáze: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|