| Autor: |
Maria de Lourdes Pessole Biondo-Simões, Laísa Brandão Carvalho, Lucas Tavares Conceição, Kassyane Bordignon Piccinelli dos Santos, Wagner Augusto Schiel, Mayara Arantes, Tatiane da Silveira, Júlio César Magri, Fernanda Fabrini Gomes |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2017 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira, Vol 32, Iss 2, Pp 98-107 (2017) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
0102-8650 |
| DOI: |
10.1590/s0102-865020170202 |
| Popis: |
Abstract Purpose: To compare the polypropylene mesh (Marlex®) to Vicryl®, Parietex composite® and Ultrapro® meshes to assess the occurrence of adhesions in the intraperitoneal implantation. Methods: Sixty Wistar rats were allocated into three groups: PP+V, in which all the animals received a polypropylene and a Vicryl® mesh; PP+PC, with the implantation of polypropylene and Parietex composite® meshes and PP+UP, in which there was implantation of polypropylene and Ultrapro®. Macroscopic analysis was performed 28 days later to assess the percentage of mesh area affected by adhesion. Results: in the PP+ V group, the Vicryl® mesh showed lower adhesion formation (p=0.013). In the PP+PC, there were no differences between polypropylene and Parietex composite® (p=0.765). In the PP+UP group, Ultrapro® and polypropylene meshes were equivalent (p=0.198) . Conclusion: All the four meshes led to adhesions, with the Vicryl® mesh showing the least potential for its formation. |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
