| Popis: |
Alternatives to hormonal treatments (HTs) in dairy sheep reproduction management are being explored in response to increasing societal concerns regarding animal welfare and food safety. However, hormone-free reproduction implies higher variability in flock performances and additional constraints for timely synchronised artificial insemination (AI) in the flock, impacting the diffusion of genetic progress. The use of the male effect, a well-known practice to induce synchronised oestrus, combined with precision tools (e.g., heat detector), is a plausible way to implement AI without HT in dairy sheep farms. To date, the consequences of such alternative reproduction management on the whole farm sustainability remain unknown. To anticipate these potential impacts, a multiagent model (REPRIN’OV) was used to simulate dairy sheep farms’ sustainability indicators (biotechnical, economic, environmental and workload). A reproduction management scenario, including the use of the male effect followed by AI on the adult ewes (HFAI), was simulated and compared to the current reproduction management of four case study farms (Early_conv, Late_conv, Early_org and Late_org). They were selected to represent the different agricultural models (Conventional or Organic) and reproduction seasons (Early − during spring, out of ewes’ natural reproduction season − or Late −from early summer to the end of autumn) of the Roquefort Basin’s farms in Southern France. Simulation results showed that the HFAI scenario had different consequences depending on the farm’s production system type. A negative effect on most key sustainability indicators of the Conv farms was observed, as a significant reduction in the fertility rate, in the proportion of young ewes born from AI (−54% in both farms; P |
