Steiner cephalometric analysis discrepancies between conventional and digital methods using Cephninja® application software
| Autor: | Gita Gayatri, Andriani Harsanti, Yuliawati Zenab, Iwa Rahmat Sunaryo |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2016 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry, Vol 28, Iss 3 (2016) |
| Druh dokumentu: | article |
| ISSN: | 1979-0201 2549-6212 50284134 |
| DOI: | 10.24198/pjd.vol28no3.13671 |
| Popis: | Introduction: Cephalometric analysis have been widely used in orthodontics. The analysis can be conducted in two methods: conventional and digital methods. Practitioners prefer using computerized cephalometric analysis due to its simplicity and less time-consuming compared to manual or conventional method. The objective of this study was to identify discrepancies between Conventional Steiner cephalometric analysis and digital cephalometric analysis using CephNinja® Application. This study was an experimental in vivo study with descriptive and comparative approach. Methods: Thirty two negative and digital cephalograms were traced manually using Steiner analysis and digitally using CephNinja® software application. Tracing results of manually analyzed cephalogram and digitally analyzed cephalogram were then compared. Results: There were no distinguished discrepancies between the tracing results of both manually and digitally analyzed cephalogram using Steiner analysis. Conclusion: there was no significant difference of steiner cephalometric analysis conducted using conventional tracing and digital method using CephNinja® application software. |
| Databáze: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|