Autor: |
Douglas I. Lin, Richard S. P. Huang, Ioannis Ladas, Rachel B. Keller, Nimesh R. Patel, Sotirios Lakis, Brennan Decker, Tyler Janovitz, Douglas A. Mata, Jeffrey S. Ross, Jo-Anne Vergilio, Julia A. Elvin, Roy S. Herbst, Philip C. Mack, Jonathan K. Killian |
Jazyk: |
angličtina |
Rok vydání: |
2024 |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
Frontiers in Oncology, Vol 14 (2024) |
Druh dokumentu: |
article |
ISSN: |
2234-943X |
DOI: |
10.3389/fonc.2024.1328512 |
Popis: |
BackgroundWhile many molecular assays can detect mutations at low tumor purity and variant allele frequencies, complex biomarkers such as tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI), and genomic loss of heterozygosity (gLOH) require higher tumor purity for accurate measurement. Scalable, quality-controlled, tissue-conserving methods to increase tumor nuclei percentage (TN%) from tumor specimens are needed for complex biomarkers and hence necessary to maximize patient matching to approved therapies or clinical trial enrollment. We evaluated the clinical utility and performance of precision needle-punch enrichment (NPE) compared with traditional razor blade macroenrichment of tumor specimens on molecular testing success.MethodsPathologist-directed NPE was performed manually on formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded (FFPE) blocks. Quality control of target capture region and quantity of residual tumor in each tissue block was determined via a post-enrichment histologic slide recut. Resultant tumor purity and biomarker status were determined by the computational analysis pipeline component of the FDA-approved next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay, FoundationOne®CDx. Following NPE implementation for real-world clinical samples, assay performance and biomarker (MSI, TMB, gLOH) detection were analyzed.ResultsIn real-world clinical samples, enrichment rate via NPE was increased to ~50% over a 2.5-year period, exceeding the prior use of razor blade macro-enrichment ( |
Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
Externí odkaz: |
|