Impact of virtual consultations on quality of care in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and narrative synthesis protocol

Autor: Benedict Hayhoe, Azeem Majeed, Geva Greenfield, Ana Luísa Neves, Reham Aldakhil, Elena Lammila-Escalera
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2024
Předmět:
Zdroj: BMJ Open, Vol 14, Iss 11 (2024)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 2044-6055
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082452
Popis: Background Around 463 million people globally have diabetes, of which over 90% have type 2 diabetes (T2D). Projections indicate an expected increase to 700 million by 2045. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated digital health uptake, establishing virtual consultations as a feasible alternative to traditional in-person care. Despite promising preliminary evidence, a comprehensive review is needed to fully assess the impact of virtual consultations on diabetes care. This review aims to systematically evaluate the impact of remote consultations on the quality of care provided to persons with T2D, by mapping impacts against the six quality domains outlined by the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) (ie, patient-centeredness, effectiveness, efficiency, timeliness, equity and safety).Methods and analysis PubMed/MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), COCHRANE Library, EMBASE (Excerpta Medica Database), CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) and Web of Science will be searched for studies published between 2010 and 2024. Primary outcomes will include any quality measures pertaining to the NAM domains for adult patients accessing virtual consultations. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool will be used to assess the quality of the randomised studies, and the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions will be used for non-randomised studies. The findings will be summarised as a narrative synthesis. This systematic review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews on 15 November 2023 (registration number: CRD42023474219).Ethics and dissemination This review will not include primary data and therefore does not require ethical approval. This protocol complies with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Protocols guidelines. Findings will be disseminated as academic publications and conference presentations and summarised into patient-led lay summaries.
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals