Autor: |
Åsa Edergren, Gabriel Sandblom, Mikael Franko, Thorhallur Agustsson, Yucel Cengiz, Gona Jaafar |
Jazyk: |
angličtina |
Rok vydání: |
2024 |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
Surgery Open Science, Vol 19, Iss , Pp 141-145 (2024) |
Druh dokumentu: |
article |
ISSN: |
2589-8450 |
DOI: |
10.1016/j.sopen.2024.04.004 |
Popis: |
Background: An alternative method to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SLC) is the “fundus first” method (FFLC). Concerns have been raised that FFLC can lead to misinterpretation of important anatomical structures, thus causing complications of a more serious kind than SLC. Comparisons between the methods are complicated by the fact that FFLC is often used as a rescue procedure in complicated cases. To avoid confounding related to this we conducted a population-based study with comparisons on the surgeon level. Method: In GallRiks, the Swedish registry for Gallbladder surgery, we stratified all cholecystectomies performed 2006–2020 in three groups: surgeries carried out by surgeons that uses FFLC in 80% group” and the operative time was shorter (OR 0.76 [0.69–0.83]). Conclusion: In this study including >160,000 cholecystectomies, both methods was found to be equally safe. Key message: During laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the standard method of dissection and fundus first dissection are equally safe surgical techniques. Surgeons need to learn both methods to be able to use the one most appropriate for each individual case. |
Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
Externí odkaz: |
|