Autor: |
Y.H. Tutida, J.H. Montes, K.K. Borstnez, H.A. Siqueira, M. F. Güths, F. Moreira, V. Peripolli, R. Irgang, N. Morés, I. Bianchi, J.D. Kich |
Jazyk: |
English<br />Portuguese |
Rok vydání: |
2021 |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Vol 73, Iss 6, Pp 1381-1390 (2021) |
Druh dokumentu: |
article |
ISSN: |
1678-4162 |
DOI: |
10.1590/1678-4162-12450 |
Popis: |
ABSTRACT The utilization of antimicrobials in animal production, causes selection of resistant bacteria. The objective of this study was to compare the utilization of alternatives in association with preventive antibiotic therapy in swine feed during the growing and finishing phases. 1,045 animals were used from 60 to 190 days of age and were subjected to six treatments with 16 repetitions as follows: 1) antibiotic free; 2) antibiotics; 3) prebiotic; 4) probiotic; 5) essential oils; and 6) organic acid. Animals were weighted, and clinical history was recorded including mortality and diarrhea. At the abattoir, pneumonia index and gastric ulcers were investigated. The cost for each treatment was discussed. No difference between treatments were observed (P>0.05) regarding feed conversion rate (2.64±0.03), overall average weight gain (107.06±0.9kg), average daily weight gain (856.49±7.7g) and carcass weight (92.4±0.7kg). The application injectable drugs in animals presenting clinical symptoms, represented US$ 0.56/intervention, without difference between the treatments (P>0.05). Furthermore, independently of the treatment, high frequency of pneumonia was observed (>0.90). No difference for the degree of gastric ulcer nor feces consistency were observed (P>0.05). The utilization of antibiotic therapy and alternatives to antibiotics in feed did not produce benefits to the production indices and sanitary performances of the animals. |
Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
Externí odkaz: |
|