Unità e pluralità delle scienze sociali
| Autor: | Vittorio Cotesta |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | English<br />Spanish; Castilian<br />Italian |
| Rok vydání: | 2014 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies, Vol 1, Iss 9, Pp 235-257 (2014) |
| Druh dokumentu: | article |
| ISSN: | 2037-7932 2037-7924 |
| DOI: | 10.7358/ecps-2014-009-cote |
| Popis: | Unity and Plurality of the Social Sciences The author supports the view that New Realism is a positive reaction to the worst aspects of Post-modernism. The call to reality and realism is also a recurrent theme in the scientific debate, both when new sciences are founded and also in periods of paradigm change. This view is demonstrated through two cases – Thucydides criticism of Herodotus at the time of the foundation of history as a science, and Durkheim’s call to reality in the Rules of the Sociological Method. However, the author maintains that this call to reality is accompanied by a new vision of the social world, and this is seen better in the methodological works of M. Weber. By analyzing these cases, the author presents the main thesis that sciences – all empirical sciences and not just the social sciences – are such if, and only if, their logical structure is based on three principles: a) theoretical (internal) coherence, b) correspondence of the theory with the empirical world, and c) liberty, autonomy, and responsibility of the scientists. All sciences, and not just the empirical ones, are instead differentiated from one another by their object and/or by the way they view their object. This general view is illustrated through a case study of the social sciences and particularly by analyzing the epistemological structure of sociology. |
| Databáze: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|