| Autor: |
Igor Raatz, Natascha Anchieta, William Galle Dietrich |
| Jazyk: |
English<br />Spanish; Castilian<br />Italian<br />Portuguese |
| Rok vydání: |
2020 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual, Vol 21, Iss 3, Pp 296-327 (2020) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
1982-7636 |
| DOI: |
10.12957/redp.2020.54206 |
| Popis: |
The essay has as its theme the investigation of the meaning of the adjective "scientific" within the "scientific" processualism as well as the content of the "new methodological phases". The investigation is delimited within the Legal Science and its tripartite division. The objective is to demonstrate that the adjective “scientific” is not related to the methodological requirements from Legal Science. The existence of methodological phases is questioned. The hypothesis is that the adjective “scientific” and the “new phases” were used, respectively, as a discursive strategy to disqualify a theory with different epistemological bases and to claim for the “new” phases an authority that is not justified. |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
