Non-invasive versus arterial pressure monitoring in the pre-hospital critical care environment: a paired comparison of concurrently recorded measurements

Autor: Yani Perera, James Raitt, Kurtis Poole, David Metcalfe, Asher Lewinsohn
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2024
Předmět:
Zdroj: Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, Vol 32, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2024)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 1757-7241
DOI: 10.1186/s13049-024-01240-y
Popis: Abstract Background Blood pressure monitoring is important in the pre-hospital management of critically ill patients. Non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurements are commonly used but the accuracy of standard oscillometric cuff devices may be affected by extremes of physiology and adverse conditions (e.g. vibration) during transport. This study aimed to quantify the accuracy of NIBP measurements amongst patients requiring pre-hospital critical care. Methods A retrospective cohort study was undertaken using data from patients treated by a pre-hospital critical team between 1st May 2020 and 30th April 2023 that had NIBP measured concurrently with invasive blood pressure (IBP) arterial manometry. An acceptable difference was determined a priori to be 160mmHg) with reduced pairwise agreement for SBP (aOR 0.17, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.27). There was no association between patient transport and agreement between the methods for SBP, DBP, or MAP. Conclusions Non-invasive blood pressure measurements are often inaccurate in the pre-hospital critical care setting, particularly in patients with haemodynamic instability. Clinicians should be cautious when interpreting NIBP measurements and consider direct arterial pressure monitoring when circumstances allow.
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals