Complications from percutaneous-left ventricular assist devices versus intra-aortic balloon pump in acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock.

Autor: Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula, Anna V Subramaniam, Dennis H Murphree, Sri Harsha Patlolla, Lina Ya'Qoub, Vinayak Kumar, Dhiran Verghese, Wisit Cheungpasitporn, Jacob C Jentzer, Gurpreet S Sandhu, Rajiv Gulati, Nilay D Shah, Bernard J Gersh, David R Holmes, Malcolm R Bell, Gregory W Barsness
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
Zdroj: PLoS ONE, Vol 15, Iss 8, p e0238046 (2020)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 1932-6203
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238046
Popis: BackgroundThere are limited data on the complications with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device (pLVAD) vs. intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS).ObjectiveTo assess the trends, rates and predictors of complications.MethodsUsing a 17-year AMI-CS population from the National Inpatient Sample, AMI-CS admissions receiving pLVAD and IABP support were evaluated for vascular, lower limb amputation, hematologic, neurologic and acute kidney injury (AKI) complications. In-hospital mortality, hospitalization costs and length of stay in pLVAD and IABP cohorts with complications was studied.ResultsOf 168,645 admissions, 7,855 (4.7%) receiving pLVAD support. The pLVAD cohort had higher comorbidity, cardiac arrest (36.1% vs. 29.7%) and non-cardiac organ failure (74.7% vs. 56.9%) rates. Complications were higher in pLVAD compared to IABP cohort-overall 69.0% vs. 54.7%; vascular 3.8% vs. 2.1%; lower limb amputation 0.3% vs. 0.3%; hematologic 36.0% vs. 27.7%; neurologic 4.9% vs. 3.5% and AKI 55.4% vs. 39.1% (all pConclusionsAMI-CS admissions receiving pLVAD had higher rates of complications compared to the IABP, with worse in-hospital outcomes in the cohort with complications.
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje