| Autor: |
Amira Mohamed Bakr, Amal Mohamad Elattar, Eman Abdel Fattah Said, Hanan A. Mohamed, Maha Abdelgaber A. Aly |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2024 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology, Vol 40, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2024) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
2090-8539 |
| DOI: |
10.1186/s43163-024-00687-1 |
| Popis: |
Abstract Background The majority of research on the effects of cochlear implants has been on clinical evaluations of efficacy (hearing and speech skills and auditory thresholds). But it is unclear how much clinical efficacy metrics (speech, hearing, and language tests) actually demonstrate how beneficial cochlear implants (CI) are in everyday circumstances. In this study, we aim to assess the performance of a child’s current CI with both subjective and functional outcomes measures. Also, we aimed to assess factors affecting these outcomes after CI. Methods The study group included 45 cochlear-implanted children, and their chronological age ranges between 4 and 12 years. Children were divided according to their language age into three groups: group 1 (G1) includes15 children with a language age of less than 2 years, group 2 (G2) includes 15 children with a language age of 2 to less than 4 years, and group 3 (G3) includes 15 children with language age 4 to 6 years. Assessment was done in two sessions: one for phoniatric evaluation and another for audiological evaluation. Results CI enabled children to develop speech perception in a closed manner evidenced by the early speech perception (ESP) test with pattern perception being the easiest and monosyllabic words being the most difficult and the least to develop. Most children with CI were able to control their voice, to a lesser extent to use speech in meaningful use in social situations and to develop communication strategies in oral situations which were the least to develop, and this was evident by Meaningful Use of Speech Scale. Children with CI were able to acquire language, and their receptive language was better than expressive language, but their language age was below their chronological age. Conclusion The cochlear implant is an effective rehabilitative tool for the treatment of prelingually deafened children, and this was evident by our results. A hierarchal approach of speech assessment according to the language age of the child and selection of age-appropriate speech perception test is very important to assess cochlear-implanted children Speech recognition had a high degree of variability. Early implantation age and increased duration of implant experience were the most important factors associated with good performance with CI, better speech perception, and better language outcomes. |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink