Hominis Presumptions and Evidential Inferences

Autor:	Josep Aguiló Regla
Jazyk:	Spanish; Castilian
Rok vydání:	2017
Předmět:	presunciones presunciones hominis inferencias probatorias inferencias fácticas carga de la prueba Law
Zdroj:	Derecho PUCP, Vol 0, Iss 79, Pp 99-110 (2017)
Druh dokumentu:	article
ISSN:	0251-3420 2305-2546
DOI:	10.18800/derechopucp.201702.005
Popis:	The author challenges the terminology «legal presumptions» and «judicial presumptions», and rather refers to presumptions established by rules of presumption and to hominis presumptions. He argues that the best way to differentiate between them is by showing the contrast between «it shall be presumed» (syntagm proper to practical reasoning) and «it is presumable» (syntagm proper to theoretical reasoning). The text clarifies the relationship between the so-called hominis presumptions and the factual inferences or evidential inferences, in general. He answers the question of what the «it is presumed» syntagm (proper to the hominis presumptions) brings with respect to the «it is probable» syntagm (proper of all evidentiary inferences).
Databáze:	Directory of Open Access Journals
Externí odkaz:	https://doaj.org/article/b42ab3b2ffb04eecaaa35769d5e4dbd5 Zobrazit plný text záznamu View record in DOAJ Plný text ve formátu PDF