Autor: |
Bradly Carp, Laurence Weinberg, Luke R. Fletcher, Jake V. Hinton, Adam Cohen, Hugh Slifirski, Peter Le, Stephen Woodford, Shervin Tosif, David Liu, Vijaragavan Muralidharan, Marcos V. Perini, Mehrdad Nikfarjam, Dong-Kyu Lee |
Jazyk: |
angličtina |
Rok vydání: |
2024 |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
Frontiers in Surgery, Vol 11 (2024) |
Druh dokumentu: |
article |
ISSN: |
2296-875X |
DOI: |
10.3389/fsurg.2024.1353143 |
Popis: |
BackgroundThe concept of a “textbook outcome” is emerging as a metric for ideal surgical outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the impact of an advanced haemodynamic monitoring (AHDM) algorithm on achieving a textbook outcome in patients undergoing hepatobiliary–pancreatic surgery.MethodsThis retrospective, multicentre observational study was conducted across private and public teaching sectors in Victoria, Australia. We studied patients managed by a patient-specific, surgery-specific haemodynamic algorithm or via usual care. The primary outcome was the effect of using a patient-specific, surgery-specific AHDM algorithm for achieving a textbook outcome, with adjustment using propensity score matching. The textbook outcome criteria were defined according to the International Expert Delphi Consensus on Defining Textbook Outcome in Liver Surgery and Nationwide Analysis of a Novel Quality Measure in Pancreatic Surgery.ResultsOf the 780 weighted cases, 477 (61.2%, 95% CI: 57.7%–64.6%) achieved the textbook outcome. Patients in the AHDM group had a higher rate of textbook outcomes [n = 259 (67.8%)] than those in the Usual care group [n = 218 (54.8%); p |
Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
Externí odkaz: |
|