Biomechanical evaluation of reinsertion and revision screws in the subaxial cervical vertebrae

Autor: Wei-xin Dong, Yong Hu, Ou-jie Lai, Zhen-shan Yuan, Xiao-yang Sun
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2024
Předmět:
Zdroj: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, Vol 25, Iss 1, Pp 1-6 (2024)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-07158-3
Popis: Abstract Background This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical effects of reinserted or revised subaxial cervical vertebral screws. Methods The first part aimed to gauge the maximum insertional torque (MIT) of 30 subaxial cervical vertebrae outfitted with 4.0-mm titanium screws. A reinsertion group was created wherein a screw was wholly removed and replaced along the same trajectory to test its maximum pullout strength (MPOS). A control group was also implemented. The second part involved implanting 4.0-mm titanium screws into 20 subaxial cervical vertebrae, testing them to failure, and then reinserting 4.5-mm revision screws along the same path to determine and compare the MIT and MPOS between the test and revision groups. Results Part I findings: No significant difference was observed in the initial insertion’s maximum insertion torque (MIT) and maximum pull-out strength (MPOS) between the control and reinsertion groups. However, the MIT of the reinsertion group was substantially decreased compared to the first insertion. Moderate to high correlations were observed between the MIT and MPOS in both groups, as well as between the MIT of the first and second screw in the reinsertion group. Part II, the MIT and MPOS of the screw in the test group showed a strong correlation, while a modest correlation was observed for the revision screw used in failed cervical vertebrae screw. Additionally, the MPOS of the screw in the test group was significantly higher than that of the revision screw group. Conclusion This study suggests that reinsertion of subaxial cervical vertebrae screws along the same trajectory is a viable option that does not significantly affect fixation stability. However, the use of 4.5-mm revision screws is inadequate for failed fixation cases with 4.0-mm cervical vertebral screws.
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje