Comparative analysis of the results using direct lateral interbody spondilodesis and transforaminal lumbar interbody spondilodesis in patients with degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine
| Autor: | A. E. Bokov, A. A. Bulkin, S. Y. Kalinina, A. V. Leontev, S. G. Mlyavykh |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | ruština |
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
direct lateral interbody fusion
transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion degenerative diseases Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens RC254-282 Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system RC666-701 Surgery RD1-811 Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid RC86-88.9 |
| Zdroj: | Инновационная медицина Кубани, Vol 0, Iss 3, Pp 12-18 (2021) |
| Druh dokumentu: | article |
| ISSN: | 2541-9897 2500-0268 |
| DOI: | 10.35401/2500-0268-2021-23-3-12-18 |
| Popis: | Introduction Various spondylodesis techniques are used in patients with degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine, but the benefits of these techniques have not been proven.Objective of the study was to assess the effect of the type of fusion on the incidence of implant instability and related revision surgeries.Material and Methods This monocentric prospective study included 133 patients with degenerative stenosis of the lumbar spine and confirmed instability of spinal motion segments. Patients underwent transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with a single cage or direct lateral interbody fusion (DLIF) using standard-sized cages. The conventional open technique was used to supplement TLIF with pedicle screws while percutaneous screw placement was applied in patients treated with DLIF. The duration of follow-up was 18 months. Fisher's exact test was used to assess differences in the incidence of fixator instability based on MSCT and revision interventions. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between potential risk factors and complication rates.Results The use of DLIF detected by MSCT (32.9 vs 3.6%, p < 0.0001) resulted in a significant reduction in the incidence of screw instability and associated revision interventions (11.8 vs 0%, p = 0.0122). The results of logistic regression, taking into account factors such as bone density and the number of levels at which spondylodesis was performed, confirm the relationship between the reduced incidence of complications and the use of DLIF technology. Conclusion Using DLIF instead of TLIF in patients with degenerative stenosis at the lumbar spine level can lead to a significant reduction in the frequency of screw instability and associated revision surgeries. |
| Databáze: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|