Anaphylactic and nonanaphylactic reactions to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Autor: Saad Alhumaid, Abbas Al Mutair, Zainab Al Alawi, Ali A. Rabaan, Raghavendra Tirupathi, Mohammed A. Alomari, Aqeel S. Alshakhes, Abeer M. Alshawi, Gasmelseed Y. Ahmed, Hassan M. Almusabeh, Tariq T. Alghareeb, Abdulaziz A. Alghuwainem, Zainab A. Alsulaiman, Mohammed A. Alabdulmuhsin, Emad A. AlBuwaidi, Amjad K. Bu Dukhi, Hani N. Mufti, Manaf Al-Qahtani, Kuldeep Dhama, Jaffar A. Al-Tawfiq, Awad Al-Omari
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2021
Předmět:
Zdroj: Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, Vol 17, Iss 1, Pp 1-24 (2021)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 1710-1492
DOI: 10.1186/s13223-021-00613-7
Popis: Abstract Background Currently there is no systematic review and meta-analysis of the global incidence rates of anaphylactic and nonanaphylactic reactions to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in the general adult population. Objectives To estimate the incidence rates of anaphylactic and nonanaphylactic reactions after COVID-19 vaccines and describe the demographic and clinical characteristics, triggers, presenting signs and symptoms, treatment and clinical course of confirmed cases. Design A systematic review and meta-analysis. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses [PRISMA] statement was followed. Methods Electronic databases (Proquest, Medline, Embase, Pubmed, CINAHL, Wiley online library, and Nature) were searched from 1 December 2020 to 31 May 2021 in the English language using the following keywords alone or in combination: anaphylaxis, non-anaphylaxis, anaphylactic reaction, nonanaphylactic reaction, anaphylactic/anaphylactoid shock, hypersensitivity, allergy reaction, allergic reaction, immunology reaction, immunologic reaction, angioedema, loss of consciousness, generalized erythema, urticaria, urticarial rash, cyanosis, grunting, stridor, tachypnoea, wheezing, tachycardia, abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting and tryptase. We included studies in adults of all ages in all healthcare settings. Effect sizes of prevalence were pooled with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). To minimize heterogeneity, we performed sub-group analyses. Results Of the 1,734 papers that were identified, 26 articles were included in the systematic review (8 case report, 5 cohort, 4 case series, 2 randomized controlled trial and 1 randomized cross-sectional studies) and 14 articles (1 cohort, 2 case series, 1 randomized controlled trial and 1 randomized cross-sectional studies) were included in meta-analysis. Studies involving 26,337,421 vaccine recipients [Pfizer-BioNTech (n = 14,505,399) and Moderna (n = 11,831,488)] were analyzed. The overall pooled prevalence estimate of anaphylaxis to both vaccines was 5.0 (95% CI 2.9 to 7.2, I 2 = 81%, p =
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje