Autor: |
Ravindranath Tiruvoipati, John Botha, Jason Fletcher, Himangsu Gangopadhyay, Mainak Majumdar, Sanjiv Vij, Eldho Paul, David Pilcher, Australia and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Clinical Trials Group |
Jazyk: |
angličtina |
Rok vydání: |
2017 |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
PLoS ONE, Vol 12, Iss 7, p e0181827 (2017) |
Druh dokumentu: |
article |
ISSN: |
1932-6203 |
DOI: |
10.1371/journal.pone.0181827 |
Popis: |
Some patients experience a delayed discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU) where the intended and actual discharge times do not coincide. The clinical implications of this remain unclear.To determine the incidence and duration of delayed ICU discharge, identify the reasons for delay and evaluate the clinical consequences.Prospective multi-centre observational study involving five ICUs over a 3-month period. Delay in discharge was defined as >6 hours from the planned discharge time. The primary outcome measure was hospital length stay after ICU discharge decision. Secondary outcome measures included ICU discharge after-hours, incidence of delirium, survival to hospital discharge, discharge destination, the incidence of ICU acquired infections, revocation of ICU discharge decision, unplanned readmissions to ICU within 72 hours, review of patients admitting team after ICU discharge decision.A total of 955 out of 1118 patients discharged were included in analysis. 49.9% of the patients discharge was delayed. The most common reason (74%) for delay in discharge was non-availability of ward bed. The median duration of the delay was 24 hours. On univariable analysis, the duration of hospital stay from the time of ICU discharge decision was significantly higher in patients who had ICU discharge delay (Median days-5 vs 6; p = 0.003). After-hours discharge was higher in patients whose discharge was delayed (34% Vs 10%; p |
Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
Externí odkaz: |
|