Virtual Reality Portable Perimetry and Home Monitoring of Glaucoma: Retention and Compliance over a 2-year Period

Autor: Runjie B. Shi, MD, PhD, Leo Y. Li-Han, PhD, Irfan N. Kherani, MD, FRCSC, Graham E. Trope, PhD, FRCSC, Yvonne M. Buys, MD, FRCSC, Willy Wong, PhD, Moshe Eizenman, PhD
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2025
Předmět:
Zdroj: Ophthalmology Science, Vol 5, Iss 2, Pp 100639- (2025)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 2666-9145
DOI: 10.1016/j.xops.2024.100639
Popis: Purpose: To evaluate long-term retention, compliance, and performance of glaucoma patients using a virtual reality portable perimeter to monitor visual fields (VFs) at home. Design: Prospective, longitudinal, cohort study. Subjects: Twenty-five glaucoma patients with stable and reliable VFs (average age 67.4 years) were recruited at Toronto Western Hospital, Ontario, Canada. Methods: Participants were instructed to perform bilateral home VF tests fortnightly for 2 years using the Toronto Portable Perimeter (TPP). Based on empirical home monitoring data, simulation analyses were conducted to evaluate the progression detection performance of high-frequency TPP testing. Main Outcome Measures: Retention rates were calculated as the percentage of participants who performed ≥1 home VF test. Compliance rates measured the percentage of participants adhering to the recommended test frequency of every 2-month period. Visual field indices, test reliability, intertest variability, and the precision of estimating progression rate with TPP were compared to those with the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA). After 6 months, participants completed a questionnaire to evaluate their experiences and preferences. The years required to detect progression were also compared between HFA and TPP tests. Results: Eighteen of the 25 participants (72%) completed ≥1 unsupervised VF test at home, with an average test frequency of 1.6 tests/month. Compliance decreased as the monitoring duration progressed, dropping from 83% (initial 2 months) to 11% (final 2 months). Unfamiliarity with technology and time constraints were identified as the main barriers to regular testing. Visual field indices of TPP home tests were strongly correlated with clinical results (r > 0.900). Home testing significantly reduced intertest variability (P
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals