Autor: |
Zoltán Vokó, István Bitter, Beatrix Mersich, János Réthelyi, Anett Molnár, János G. Pitter, Árpád Götze, Margit Horváth, Kristóf Kóczián, Laura Fonticoli, Filippo Lelli, Bertalan Németh |
Jazyk: |
angličtina |
Rok vydání: |
2020 |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, Vol 18, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2020) |
Druh dokumentu: |
article |
ISSN: |
1478-7547 |
DOI: |
10.1186/s12962-020-00224-w |
Popis: |
Abstract Background When patient health state transition evidence is missing from clinical literature, analysts are inclined to make simple assumptions to complete the transition matrices within a health economic model. Our aim was to provide a solution for estimating transition matrices by the Bayesian statistical method within a health economic model when empirical evidence is lacking. Methods We used a previously published cost-effectiveness analysis of the use of cariprazine compared to that of risperidone in patients with predominantly negative symptoms of schizophrenia. We generated the treatment-specific state transition probability matrices in three different ways: (1) based only on the observed clinical trial data; (2) based on Bayesian estimation where prior transition probabilities came from experts’ opinions; and (3) based on Bayesian estimation with vague prior transition probabilities (i.e., assigning equal prior probabilities to the missing transitions from one state to the others). For the second approach, we elicited Dirichlet prior distributions by three clinical experts. We compared the transition probability matrices and the incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) across the three approaches. Results The estimates of the prior transition probabilities from the experts were feasible to obtain and showed considerable consistency with the clinical trial data. As expected, the estimated health benefit of the treatments was different when only the clinical trial data were considered (QALY difference 0.0260), its combination with the experts’ beliefs were used in the economic model (QALY difference 0.0253), and when vague prior distributions were used (QALY difference 0.0243). Conclusions Imputing zeros to missing transition probabilities in Markov models might be untenable from the clinical perspective and may result in inappropriate estimates. Bayesian statistics provides an appropriate framework for imputing missing values without making overly simple assumptions. Informative priors based on expert opinions might be more appropriate than vague priors. |
Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
Externí odkaz: |
|
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje |
K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit.
|