The Cost-effectiveness of Valganciclovir Prophylaxis Versus Preemptive Therapy in CMV R+ Kidney Transplant Recipients Over the First Year Posttransplantation

Autor: Claire Villeneuve, PhD, Jean-Phillipe Rerolle, MD, Lionel Couzi, MD, PhD, Pierre-Francois Westeel, MD, Isabelle Etienne, MD, Laure Esposito, MD, Nassim Kamar, MD, PhD, Mathias Büchler, MD, PhD, Antoine Thierry, MD, PhD, Pierre Marquet, MD, PhD, Caroline Monchaud, PharmD, PhD
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2024
Předmět:
Zdroj: Transplantation Direct, Vol 10, Iss 8, p e1678 (2024)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 2373-8731
00000000
DOI: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001678
Popis: Background. In kidney transplant recipients with positive serology (R+) for the cytomegalovirus (CMV), 2 strategies are used to prevent infection, whose respective advantages over the other are still debated. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and cost utility of antiviral prophylaxis against CMV versus preemptive therapy, considering CMV infection–free survival over the first year posttransplantation as the main clinical outcome. Methods. Clinical, laboratory, and economic data were collected from 186 kidney transplant patients CMV (R+) included in the cohort study (85 patients who benefited from CMV prophylaxis and 101 from preemptive therapy). Costs were calculated from the hospital perspective and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) using the EQ5D form. Using nonparametric bootstrapping, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and cost utility were estimated (euros) for each case of infection avoided and each QALY gained for 1 y, respectively. Results. Prophylaxis significantly decreased the risk of CMV infection over the first year posttransplantation (hazard ratio 0.22, 95% confidence interval = 0.12-0.37, P
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals