| Autor: |
Anaís Mariscal, Milena Milán, Andrés Baucells, Maria Angeles Martínez, Andrea Garcia Guillen, Ernesto Trallero-Araguás, Marcelo Alvarado-Cardenas, Laura Martínez-Martínez, Leticia Alserawan, Teresa Franco-Leyva, María Teresa Sanz-Martínez, Laura Viñas-Giménez, Hector Corominas, Cándido Juárez, Iván Castellví, Albert Selva-O’Callaghan |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2021 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Frontiers in Immunology, Vol 11 (2021) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
1664-3224 |
| DOI: |
10.3389/fimmu.2020.625896 |
| Popis: |
ObjectivesAnti-TIF-1γ autoantibody detection is important for cancer screening in patients with dermatomyositis. The gold standard for anti-TIF-1γ detection, immunoprecipitation, is only available from a few specialized laboratories worldwide, so commercial ELISA/immunoblot tests have emerged in recent years. To analyze their usefulness in diagnosing cancer-associated dermatomyositis, we compared Euroimmun Euroline profile with our previously validated in-house immunoblot assay with human recombinant TIF-1γ.MethodsWe included 308 adult patients from Hospital de la Santa Creu I Sant Pau and Vall Hebrón Hospital (Barcelona, Spain) tested for anti-TIF-1γ autoantibodies using the Euroline profile and an in-house immunoblot assay.ResultsA total of 27 anti-TIF-1γ were detected by the Euroline and 12 by the in-house assay. Fair agreement was observed between Euroline and the in-house immunoblot Cohen’s kappa 0.3163. Expected prevalence of anti-TIF-1γ autoantibodies was observed for the two methods for dermatomyositis and undifferentiated connective tissue diseases, but unexpectedly high prevalence of anti-TIF-1γ autoantibodies was detected by Euroline compared to the in-house immunoblot for other diseases (16.5% Euroline vs 0.8% in-house immunoblot, p |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
