Comparison of Fusion and Complication Rates in Patients with Primary Open Ankle Arthrodesis
| Autor: | Alexej Barg MD, Mikayla Lyman BS, S. Craig Morris MD, Charles L. Saltzman MD |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2016 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics, Vol 1 (2016) |
| Druh dokumentu: | article |
| ISSN: | 2473-0114 24730114 |
| DOI: | 10.1177/2473011416S00151 |
| Popis: | Category: Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: In the last decades, different surgical techniques with various approaches and fixation methods have been described for ankle arthrodesis. Tibiotalar arthrodesis can be performed with or without distal tibiofibular fusion. The objectives of this retrospective study were to compare (1) demographics, (2) surgical techniques, (3) postoperative fusion rates, and (4) postoperative complication rates in patients with primary open tibiotalar arthrodesis with vs. without distal tibiofibular fusion. Methods: Between March 2002 and November 2014, 322 primary open ankle arthrodeses were performed at our institution. There were 183 male and 139 female patients with a mean age of 56.0 ± 14.0 years (18.0-88.8). The mean weight, height, and body mass index (BMI) were 90.0 ± 20.4 kg (46-168), 172.9 ± 11.4 cm (147-208), and 30.0 ± 5.7 kg/m2 (18.9-54.9), respectively. Both patient groups were compared with regard to demographics including gender, weight, height, BMI, ASA classification, smoking, alcohol use, and comorbidities. The surgical technique has been analyzed in both groups including surgical approach, main fixation type, and allograft/autograft use. Finally, fusion rate and time to complete osseous fusion were analyzed. Complication rates including wound complications, deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, and any secondary procedures were described in both groups. The mean time to final follow-up was 36.7 ± 26.7 months (12.0-150.4). Results: 214 had a combined distal tibiofibular fusion, while 108 did not. The most common surgical approach was lateral and anterior in patients with and without distal tibiofibular fusion, respectively (P < 0.001). The main fixation type was different between groups, with the most common technique being screws for patients with tibiofibular fusion, and plates in those without (P < 0.001). Autograft and allograft were used significantly less frequently in patients without distal tibiofibular fusion. The rate of osseous union was comparable in both groups with 92.2% and 93.0% in patients with and without distal tibiofibular fusion, respectively (P = 0.675). The incidence of wound and thrombembolic complications was similar in both groups. Conclusion: The osseous union rates and complication rates were comparable in both patient groups, with and without distal tibiofibular fusion. |
| Databáze: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|