| Popis: |
Biological indicators are important quality elements for classification of ecological status of water bodies according to the European Water Framework Directive. Multimetric indices are commonly regarded as robust and reliable indicators of human impact and are often used as quality elements. In fish-based indices, species are often grouped into guilds based on general tolerance to common anthropogenic pressures, with higher proportion of tolerant species being indicative of degraded systems. Within the Swedish electrofishing index VIX, the critically endangered European eel Anguilla anguilla (L.) is classified as a tolerant indicator species, and it therefore has a negative effect on classified ecological status. The scientific literature, however, suggests that eels are not generally tolerant and they benefit from similar environmental conditions as many insensitive species. VIX has been criticized for being too sensitive to the presence of eel in catch data, leading to low status classifications when eels are caught in the monitoring surveys. In a case study using manipulations of historical electrofishing data, we assessed the influence of eel presence and abundance on the ecological status classification as determined by VIX. We demonstrate that reduction of eels in survey data have positive effects on the classified status, in many cases substantial effects. An increase of eels in the data had the reverse effect. Mere presence of eel had a strong negative effect, which is problematic if the aim is to increase the endangered eel population. Given the Swedish classification system where the quality element indicating the worst status is decisive, the classified ecological status of Swedish rivers can theoretically be improved by management actions disfavouring eel, unless the results from VIX are carefully evaluated by experts. Along the same lines, measures implemented with an aim to increase the endangered eel population will lead to a decrease in assessed ecological status of Swedish rivers. Our conclusion is that the usage of VIX within Swedish water management is problematic and needs revision. From a broader perspective, the classification of species as generally tolerant need to be approached with great caution when developing new indices for assessing ecological status and integrity. |
Full Text from ScienceDirect