Comparison of atrial fibrillation ablation efficacy using remote magnetic navigation vs. manual navigation with contact-force control
| Autor: | Jiri Jez, Tomasz Jadczyk, Frantisek Lehar, Martin Pesl, Tomas Kulik, Silvie Belaskova, Filip Soucek, Guido Caluori, Wojciech Wojakowski, Zdenek Starek |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Biomedical Papers, Vol 164, Iss 4, Pp 387-393 (2020) |
| Druh dokumentu: | article |
| ISSN: | 1213-8118 1804-7521 |
| DOI: | 10.5507/bp.2019.045 |
| Popis: | Aims: This study aims to compare procedural parameters and clinical efficacy of remote magnetic navigation (RMN) vs. manual navigation (MAN) approach for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: 146 patients with AF were enrolled in the study. In the RMN group (n=57), patients were treated with the CARTO® 3 in combination with the Niobe ES system. In the MAN group (n=89), ablation was performed with the EnSite Velocity and TactiCath™ Quartz catheter with direct contact force measurement. Procedural time, ablation time, fluoroscopy time, radiation dose and ablation counts were measured and compared between the groups. Recurrence of AF was evaluated after 6 months of follow-up. Results: Mean procedure times (236.87±64.31 vs. 147.22±45.19 min, P |
| Databáze: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|