| Autor: |
Ming-Chen Wu, Ming-Yi Hsu, Ren-Fu Shie, Ming-Huei Cheng, Fang-I Chu, Chien-Yuan Lin, Yui-Ping Fan, Sung-Yu Chu |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2019 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
BMC Medical Imaging, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2019) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
1471-2342 |
| DOI: |
10.1186/s12880-019-0368-7 |
| Popis: |
Abstract Background The aim of this study was to compare non-contrast-enhanced 3D phase contrast magnetic resonance angiography (3D PC-MRA) and conventional intravenous administration of contrast media, i.e., contrast-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA), to evaluate the courses of facial arteries for the preparation of vascularized submental lymph node flap (VSLN flap) transfer. Methods The head and neck regions of 20 patients with limb lymphedema were imaged using a 3 T MRI scanner. To improve the evaluation of facial artery courses, MRA was fused with anatomical structures generated by high-resolution T1-weighted imaging. The diagnostic and image qualities of facial arteries for VSLN flap planning were independently rated by two radiologists. Interobserver agreement was evaluated using Cohen’s kappa. Differences between 3D PC-MRA and CE-MRA in terms of the diagnostic quality of facial arteries were evaluated using McNemar’s test. Results Cohen’s kappa indicated fair to good interobserver agreement for the diagnostic and image qualities of the bilateral facial arteries. No significant difference in terms of the diagnostic quality of the left and right facial arteries between 3D PC-MRA and CE-MRA, respectively, was identified. Conclusions Non-contrast 3D PC-MRA is a reliable method for the evaluation of facial artery courses prior to VSLN flap transfer and could serve as an alternative to CE-MRA for patients with renal insufficiency or severe adverse reactions to contrast media. |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink