Implementing a complex mental health intervention in occupational settings: process evaluation of the MENTUPP pilot study

Autor: Ulrich Hegerl, Paul Corcoran, eve griffin, Ella Arensman, Chantal Van Audenhove, Reiner Rugulies, Margaret Maxwell, Kahar Abula, Katherine Thompson, Kristian Wahlbeck, Asmae Doukani, Gentiana Qirjako, Jaap van Weeghel, Birgit Aust, Charlotte Paterson, Birgit Greiner, Grace Cully, Hans De Witte, Caleb Leduc, Hanna Reich, Sarita Sanches, Naim Fanaj, Fotini Tsantila, Victoria Ross, Sharna Mathieu, Arlinda Cerga Pashoja, György Purebl, Evelien Coppens, Lars De Winter, Arilda Dushaj, Bridget Hogg, Carolyn Holland, Mallorie Leduc, Doireann Ni Dhalaigh, Cliodhna O' Brien, Mónika Ditta Tóth, Benedikt Amann, Laura Cox, Johanna Creswell-Smith, Luigia D’Alessandro, Grace Davey, Kim Dooyoung, Stefan Hackel, Ana Moreno- Alcazar, Karen Mulcahy, Ainslie O’ Connor, Wendy Orchard, Saara Rapeli, Andras Szekely, Eva Zsak
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2023
Předmět:
Zdroj: BMJ Open, Vol 13, Iss 12 (2023)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 2044-6055
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077093
Popis: Background According to the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework, the theorisation of how multilevel, multicomponent interventions work and the understanding of their interaction with their implementation context are necessary to be able to evaluate them beyond their complexity. More research is needed to provide good examples following this approach in order to produce evidence-based information on implementation practices.Objectives This article reports on the results of the process evaluation of a complex mental health intervention in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) tested through a pilot study. The overarching aim is to contribute to the evidence base related to the recruitment, engagement and implementation strategies of applied mental health interventions in the workplace.Method The Mental Health Promotion and Intervention in Occupational Settings (MENTUPP) intervention was pilot tested in 25 SMEs in three work sectors and nine countries. The evaluation strategy of the pilot test relied on a mixed-methods approach combining qualitative and quantitative research methods. The process evaluation was inspired by the RE-AIM framework and the taxonomy of implementation outcomes suggested by Proctor and colleagues and focused on seven dimensions: reach, adoption, implementation, acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility and maintenance.Results Factors facilitating implementation included the variety of the provided materials, the support provided by the research officers (ROs) and the existence of a structured plan for implementation, among others. Main barriers to implementation were the difficulty of talking about mental health, familiarisation with technology, difficulty in fitting the intervention into the daily routine and restrictions caused by COVID-19.Conclusions The results will be used to optimise the MENTUPP intervention and the theoretical framework that we developed to evaluate the causal mechanisms underlying MENTUPP. Conducting this systematic and comprehensive process evaluation contributes to the enhancement of the evidence base related to mental health interventions in the workplace and it can be used as a guide to overcome their contextual complexity.Trial registration number ISRCTN14582090.
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals