The Hans Kelsen fundamental hypothetical standard and the Herbert Hart recognition rule: similarities and differences between the validity criteria of the legal system

Autor:	Alex Silva Gonçalves, Regio Hermilton Ribeiro Quirino
Jazyk:	German<br />English<br />Spanish; Castilian<br />Portuguese
Rok vydání:	2018
Předmět:	Teoria do Direito Norma Hipotética Fundamental Regra de Reconhecimento Law Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence K1-7720
Zdroj:	Sequência: Estudos Juridicos e Politicos, Vol 39, Iss 78, Pp 91-118 (2018)
Druh dokumentu:	article
ISSN:	0101-9562 2177-7055
DOI:	10.5007/2177-7055.2018v39n78p91
Popis:	The validity of the legal system was thought by jus philosophers such as Hans Kelsen and Herbert Hart, respectively, the fundamental hypothetical norm and the rule of recognition. This article will address these concepts, with the goal of conducting a comparative study between the two, and then pointing out their similarities and differences. To do so, we used the deductive approach and bibliographic research. At the end of the article, similarities were perceived, both being theoretical constructions of legal positivism of criterion of validity for the legal order, and differences, a logical-transcendental presupposition of validity (Kelsen) as an element of fact of validity (Hart).
Databáze:	Directory of Open Access Journals
Externí odkaz:	https://doaj.org/article/c8dd688f3bb44beb8ad5d4e45c35ea09 Zobrazit plný text záznamu View record in DOAJ Plný text ve formátu PDF