Variations in the Management of Zone 2 5th Metatarsal Fractures Based on Physician Specialty

Autor: Matthew T. Kingery MD, Manasa Kadiyala BS, Raymond J. Walls MD, FRCS(Tr&Orth), MFSEM, FAAOS, Abhishek Ganta MD, Sanjit Konda MD, Nicole Stevens MD, Kenneth A. Egol MD
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2023
Předmět:
Zdroj: Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics, Vol 8 (2023)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 2473-0114
24730114
DOI: 10.1177/2473011423S00452
Popis: Category: Midfoot/Forefoot; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: There is a wide variation in the management of acute “Zone 2” 5th metatarsal (MT) base fractures. The purpose of this study was to quantify these differences and evaluate the effect of treating physician specialty. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with acute Zone 2 5th MT fractures who presented to a single large, urban, academic medical center between December 2012 and April 2022. Zone 2 was defined as the region of the 5th MT base bordered by the 4th and 5th MT articulation on the oblique radiographic view. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the odds of undergoing operative treatment based on provider specialty. Results: A total of 633 patients presented with Zone 2 fractures during the study period. 40.6% of patients initially presented to the ED, 36.3% to an urgent care (UC) center, and 23.1% directly to the office. Ultimately, 57.2% of patients were treated by orthopedic surgeons, 39.6% by podiatrists, and 3.2% by primary care physicians. For patients treated nonoperatively, the management plan significantly differed by treating specialty. Compared to podiatrists, patients treated by orthopedic surgeons were more likely to be treated in a hard sole shoe (30.8% versus 7.6%, p< 0.001) and less likely to be treated using a CAM boot (57.3% versus 76.3%, p< 0.001). Similarly, patients treated by orthopedic surgeons were more likely to be made WBAT compared to patients treated by podiatrists (71.8% versus 42.0%, p< 0.001). Conclusion: Overall, 2.5% of patients with Zone 2 metatarsal fractures were treated operatively. 0.5% of patients treated by orthopedic surgeons underwent surgery compared to 6.1% of patients treated by podiatrists (p=0.001). Furthermore, when controlling for age, sex, and time between injury and initial presentation to the office, the likelihood of undergoing operative treatment was still significantly greater when being treated by a podiatrist (OR=16.5, p=0.009). There is considerable heterogeneity among the treatment strategies for Zone 2 proximal 5th MT fractures. Compared to podiatrists, orthopedic surgeons are less likely to treat patients operatively and more likely to allow early weight bearing.
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals