| Autor: |
Virginia T. LeBaron, Bethany J. Horton, Abish Adhikari, Sandhya Chapagain, Manita Dhakal, Rajesh Gongal, Regina Kattel, Ganesh Koirala, Anna Kutcher, Ben Hass, Martha Maurer, Daniel Munday, Bijay Neupane, Krishna Sharma, Ramila Shilpakar, Amuna Shrestha, Sudip Shrestha, Usha Thapa, Rebecca Dillingham, Bishnu D. Paudel |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2022 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Frontiers in Pain Research, Vol 3 (2022) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
2673-561X |
| DOI: |
10.3389/fpain.2022.910995 |
| Popis: |
IntroductionQuality palliative care, which prioritizes comfort and symptom control, can reduce global suffering from non-communicable diseases, such as cancer. To address this need, the Nepalese Association of Palliative Care (NAPCare) created pain management guidelines (PMG) to support healthcare providers in assessing and treating serious pain. The NAPCare PMG are grounded in World Health Organization best practices but adapted for the cultural and resource context of Nepal. Wider adoption of the NAPCare PMG has been limited due to distribution of the guidelines as paper booklets.MethodsBuilding on a long-standing partnership between clinicians and researchers in the US and Nepal, the NAPCare PMG mobile application (“app”) was collaboratively designed. Healthcare providers in Nepal were recruited to pilot test the app using patient case studies. Then, participants completed a Qualtrics survey to evaluate the app which included the System Usability Scale (SUS) and selected items from the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS). Descriptive and summary statistics were calculated and compared across institutions and roles. Regression analyses to explore relationships (α = 0.05) between selected demographic variables and SUS and MARS scores were also conducted.ResultsNinety eight healthcare providers (n = 98) pilot tested the NAPCare PMG app. Overall, across institutions and roles, the app received an SUS score of 76.0 (a score > 68 is considered above average) and a MARS score of 4.10 (on a scale of 1 = poor, 5 = excellent). 89.8% (n = 88) “agreed” or “strongly agreed” that the app will help them better manage cancer pain. Age, years of experience, and training in palliative care were significant in predicting SUS scores (p-values, 0.0124, 0.0371, and 0.0189, respectively); institution was significant in predicting MARS scores (p = 0.0030).ConclusionThe NAPCare PMG mobile app was well-received, and participants rated it highly on both the SUS and MARS. Regression analyses suggest end-user variables important to consider in designing and evaluating mobile apps in lower resourced settings. Our app design and pilot testing process illustrate the benefits of cross global collaborations to build research capacity and generate knowledge within the local context. |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
