| Autor: |
Federico Penelas |
| Jazyk: |
English<br />Spanish; Castilian<br />Portuguese |
| Rok vydání: |
2010 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Ideas y Valores, Vol 59, Iss 144, Pp 83-97 (2010) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
0120-0062 |
| Popis: |
One of the consequences of Richard Rorty’s critique of traditional epistemology is the rejection of veroteleologism, that is, the thesis according to which truth is the end or goal of inquiry. This article aims at consolidating the anti-veroteleological position, on the basis of a critical examination of a series of critiques made from both “realist” and Peircean-style pragmatist perspectives. Consequently, the debate centers on some considerations formulated by Alvin Goldman and Akeel Bilgrami in favor of veroteleologism and against positions such as Rorty’s. |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
