Autor: |
Gilberto Campos Guimarães Filho, Priscila Valverde de Oliveira Vitorino, Sayuri Inuzuka, Adriana Sebba Barroso, Robson Pierre Pacífico Alves Filho, Victoria Alves Melo, Luiz Fernando de Oliveira Urzeda, Ana Luiza Lima Sousa, Antonio Coca, Paulo César Brandão Veiga Jardim, Weimar Kunz Sebba Barroso |
Jazyk: |
angličtina |
Rok vydání: |
2023 |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, Vol 10 (2023) |
Druh dokumentu: |
article |
ISSN: |
2297-055X |
DOI: |
10.3389/fcvm.2023.1247146 |
Popis: |
BackgroundArterial hypertension treatment guided by central blood pressures (CPB) rather than peripheral blood pressures (PBP) measurement has the potential to show greater effectiveness in preventing or even regressing stiffness and target organ damage (TOD).ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare the parameters of CBP and PBP measurements, arterial stiffness, TOD and renal profile in patients with anti-hypertensive treatment guided by CBP or PBP targets.MethodsA randomized clinical trial was conducted in central group (CG) and peripheral group (PG). Patients were randomized, evaluated every 3 months for BP and antihypertensive adjustments during a one-year follow up. The procedures in V1 and V5: anthropometric assessment; CBP/PBP measurements, carotid ultrasound; echocardiography; laboratory tests. Paired and unpaired t-tests and the χ2 were used (significance level: 5%).ResultsThe study evaluated 59 participants (30CG/29PG). The augmentation index (AIx) was higher in the CG (27.3% vs. 20.3%, p = 0.041). Intergroup analysis has found central diastolic BP lower in the CG (78.9 vs. 84.3 mmHg, p = 0.024) and the Alx difference between groups ceased to exist after a one-year follow-up. Intragroup comparisons, after intervention, showed a lower frequency of changed PWV (p |
Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
Externí odkaz: |
|