| Popis: |
Alessio Lucarini, Giovanni Maria Garbarino, Pierfrancesco Orlandi, Eleonora Garofalo, Lorenzo Bragaglia, Giovanni Guglielmo Laracca, Giulia Canali, Alessandra Pecoraro, Paolo Mercantini On behalf of the Sant’Andrea GLAM collaborative groupDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Rome, ItalyCorrespondence: Alessio Lucarini, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy, Email alessio.lucarini@uniroma1.itBackground: MultiDisciplinary Team (MDT) are held to undertake decisions regarding the whole aspect of oncological diseases. Over the years, they acquired a collaborative approach where clinical decisions are shared by all members. Different guidelines recommend the implementation of MDT, in order to improve the outcomes of these patients. Our aim is to evaluate how the implementation of MDT affects the patients’ satisfaction and adherence to treatment.Methods: A survey was submitted to every patient affected by colorectal cancer treated by the MDT of Sant’Andrea Hospital (Rome, IT). The investigation period was January 2017–March 2020. Data from patients inside the MDT were compared with patients outside the MDT to evaluate a reduction in waiting times.Results: A total of 591 patients were collected. A total of 355 patients with colorectal neoplasia were included in our analysis. Cumulative overall survival was 79%. The average waiting time for computed tomography or colonoscopy was 14.9 days for patients in the MDT versus 24.5. A total of 201 patients were eligible for our satisfaction survey. An 89.5% of patients felt followed in their treatment. A 93.5% of patients expressed a high grade of satisfaction for the MDT design.Conclusion: Our study confirms the importance of a well-structured MDT. Dedicated slots shorten the waiting time, leading to better satisfaction and faster diagnosis. Patients’ satisfaction should be considered as an index of good practice when it comes to oncological patients’ treatment.Keywords: cancer, multidisciplinary team meeting, patient assessment, patient management, patient outcomes |
