Logical Analysis of Law and Postpositivism – A Dialogue from the Theories of Alchourron/Bulygin and Atienza/Manero

Autor:	Dennis José Almanza Torres
Jazyk:	German<br />English<br />Spanish; Castilian<br />Portuguese
Rok vydání:	2019
Předmět:	Análisis lógico del derecho Sistema Pos positivismo Law Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence K1-7720
Zdroj:	Sequência: Estudos Juridicos e Politicos, Vol 39, Iss 80, Pp 31-50 (2019)
Druh dokumentu:	article
ISSN:	0101-9562 2177-7055
DOI:	10.5007/2177-7055.2018v39n80p31
Popis:	For Carlos Alchourron and EugenioBulygin, a judicial sentence is justifiableaccording to law only if it contains a logicalsequence of rules and the description of a case.Manuel Atienza and Juan Ruiz Manero deny theapplication of this theory to the legal reasoning.They assert that a different conceptualapparatus is needed that understands law as anactivity where society participates and the juristhas the function of deploying it. This articleexamines and confronts the main theses of theauthors mentioned, emphasizing characters thatshould not be ignored when a judicial decisionis justified.
Databáze:	Directory of Open Access Journals
Externí odkaz:	https://doaj.org/article/88796704fa0746adaadff4d5ad013077 Zobrazit plný text záznamu View record in DOAJ Plný text ve formátu PDF