| Popis: |
Dima Touhami,1,2 Stefan Essig,1,3 Anke Scheel-Sailer,1,4 Armin Gemperli1– 3 1Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, 6002, Switzerland; 2Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, 6207, Switzerland; 3Center of Primary and Community Care, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, 6002, Switzerland; 4Swiss Paraplegic Center, Nottwil, 6207, SwitzerlandCorrespondence: Dima Touhami, Swiss Paraplegic Research, Guido A. Zäch Strasse 4, Nottwil, 6207, Switzerland, Tel +41 41 939 65 65, Email dima.touhami@paraplegie.chPurpose: In a country of free selection of providers, general practitioners (GPs) remain the most visited health-care professionals by the vast majority of persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) in Switzerland; yet, little is known about these contacts. The study aims to explore reasons for encounters (RFEs) in general practice, and their relationships to first-contact of care (GP or specialist) and GP’s competence in managing SCI-specific problems.Patients and Methods: Cross-sectional study from baseline data of non-randomized controlled trial. Persons with SCI in the chronic phase and living in Swiss rural communities were invited. Participants were asked about RFEs (reasons and health problems) of their last visit to a GP. RFEs were coded according to the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC-2), and analyzed according to first-contact and participants’ ratings of GPs’ competence in managing SCI-specific problems.Results: Out of 395, 226 (57%) persons participated, of which 89% have reported 2.1 (SD ± 1.4) RFEs and 2.4 (± 1.7) health problems per GP visit, on average. Participants visited GPs for medications (49%), urgent medical problems (33%) and follow-up (30%). Most RFEs were related to general/unspecified problems (65%). Persons whose first contact was a specialist were more likely to visit GPs for medications (Specialist = 60% vs GP = 42%). There were no associations between RFEs and the perceived GP’s competence at P < 0.05.Conclusion: Irrespective of first contact of care, persons with SCI visit GPs for medication, urgent issues, and follow-up care, and more often for general problems than for secondary health conditions. Strengthening collaboration between GPs in rural communities and specialized centers is recommended; promoting such a connection potentially aids GPs in meeting their information needs for managing secondary health conditions and improving the quality of SCI care for this population.Keywords: general practitioners, spinal cord injury, specialists, health problems, competence |
