Justification by Faith 1517–2017: What Has Changed?
| Autor: | Anthony N. S. Lane |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Tyndale Bulletin, Vol 69, Iss 2 (2018) |
| Druh dokumentu: | article |
| ISSN: | 2752-7042 0082-7118 |
| DOI: | 10.53751/001c.27694 |
| Popis: | Justification was a key issue at the Reformation, and Protestants and Catholics have polarised over it. There was a brief moment of agreement at the Regensburg Colloquy in 1541, but this was swept away by the Council of Trent, whose Decree on Justification (1547) took care to demarcate itself from Protestantism. Hans Küng initiated a new approach, seeking points of agreement rather than difference. That approach eventually gave birth to the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification (1999). This does not pretend that no differences remain but claims that they are acceptable. It is fruitful to consider the differing concerns of each side. The focus of this paper is what may or may not have changed in Protestant–Catholic relations on justification, not the changing picture of modern biblical studies. In particular, I will not be looking at the New Perspectives (plural) on Paul nor at John Barclay’s recent magnum (if not maximum) opus. |
| Databáze: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|