The robustness of the flow-gradient classification of severe aortic stenosisCentral MessagePerspective

Autor: Bart J.J. Velders, MD, Michiel D. Vriesendorp, MD, PhD, Federico M. Asch, MD, Michael G. Moront, MD, Francois Dagenais, MD, Michael J. Reardon, MD, Joseph F. Sabik III, MD, Rolf H.H. Groenwold, MD, PhD, Robert J.M. Klautz, MD, PhD
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2023
Předmět:
Zdroj: JTCVS Open, Vol 16, Iss , Pp 177-188 (2023)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 2666-2736
DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.08.022
Popis: Objectives: A flow-gradient classification is used to determine the indication for intervention for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) with discordant echocardiographic parameters. We investigated the agreement in flow-gradient classification by stroke volume (SV) measurement at the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) and at the left ventricle. Methods: Data were used from a prospective cohort study and patients with severe AS (aortic valve area index ≤0.6 cm2/m2) with preserved ejection fraction (>50%) were selected. SV was determined by an echocardiographic core laboratory at the LVOT and by subtracting the 2-dimensional left ventricle end-systolic from the end-diastolic volume (volumetric). Patients were stratified into 4 groups based on SV index (35 mL/m2) and mean gradient (40 mm Hg). The group composition was compared and the agreement between the SV measurements was investigated using regression, correlation, and limits of agreement. In addition, a systematic LVOT diameter overestimation of 1 mm was simulated to study flow-gradient reclassification. Results: Of 1118 patients, 699 were eligible. The group composition changed considerably as agreement on flow state occurred in only 50% of the measurements. LVOT SV was on average 15.1 mL (95% limits of agreement −24.9:55.1 mL) greater than volumetric SV. When a systematic 1-mm LVOT diameter overestimation was introduced, the low-flow groups halved. Conclusions: There was poor agreement in the flow-gradient classification of severe AS as a result of large differences between LVOT and volumetric SV. Furthermore, this classification was sensitive to small measurement errors. These results stress that parameters beyond the flow-gradient classification should be considered to ensure accurate recommendations for intervention.
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals