Does FHL Tendon Transfer Alter the Outcome of Haglund Deformity Treatment by Using Debridement and Ostectomy in Patients Older Than 50 Years? A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

Autor: Amir Sabaghzadeh MD, Naser Ghanbari MD, Hediye Gholamshahi MD, MPH, Amir Mohammad Zakeri MD, Saman Shakeri Jousheghan MD, Mohammadamin Aslani MD, Maryam Khoshkholghsima MD, Mohmmad Movahedinia MD
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2024
Předmět:
Zdroj: Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics, Vol 9 (2024)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 2473-0114
24730114
DOI: 10.1177/24730114241262783
Popis: Background: Chronic Achilles tendinopathy following Haglund disease is a common ankle condition that is difficult to manage. In this study, we will compare the clinical outcomes of debridement and ostectomy with and without FHL tendon transfer in treating Haglund deformity. Methods: Forty eligible patients aged >50 years who did not respond to conservative treatment were randomly divided into 2 groups for surgical approach: using flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendon transfer (FHL group) or “standard procedure” (control group). The main surgical treatment included debridement and ostectomy. AOFAS and VISA-A scores were obtained from all patients pre- and postoperatively. Results: Twenty patients were assigned to each of the 2 groups and were observed for at least 1 year. The American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle hindfoot scores and the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment self-administered Achilles (VISA-A) questionnaires scores improved more in the FHL group; however, the average difference in the change in scores did not reach the levels previously reported for minimal clinically important differences. Surgical complications and hallux function were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Conclusion: We found that FHL tendon transfer may improve the clinical outcome scores of Achilles tendon treatment in patients aged >50 years using debridement and ostectomy. However, tendon transfer increases the time of surgery and creates additional skin incisions, which may cause more short-term wound complications, and the significance of the differences in outcome improvement may not be clinically meaningful. Level of Evidence: Level II, grade A recommendation.
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals
Externí odkaz: